The letter by which Boris Johnson resigned as Foreign Secretary was pored over and dissected by political analysts and journalists, but for cycling campaigners there was one passage that jumped it, with the former Mayor of London claiming that EU rules prevented him from introducing safer lorries to the city’s streets.
As we mentioned on our live blog this morning, it was a claim that was swiftly debunked on Twitter, with Mark Treasure, chair of the Cycling Embassy of Great Britain, highlighting that when Johnson was at City Hall, it was the British government he blamed for not implementing EU rules on HGVs.
Here is what Johnson said in his letter to Prime Minister Theresa May yesterday:
It now seems that the opening bid of our negotiations involves accepting that we are not actually going to be able to make our own laws. Indeed we seem to have gone backwards since the last Chequers meeting in February, when I described my frustrations, as Mayor of London, in trying to protect cyclists from juggernauts. We had wanted to lower the cabin windows to improve visibility; and even though such designs were already on the market, and even though there had been a horrific spate of deaths, mainly of female cyclists, we were told that we had to wait for the EU to legislate on the matter.
But that’s not the stance he took as Mayor of London in 2014, when the BBC reported that he was “deeply concerned” at the UK government’s refusal to back EU proposals to improve the safety of lorries, including larger windscreens and windows to eliminate blind spots.
He said: "This is a once-in-a-decade opportunity for the EU to remove some of the blockages which prevent us from making lorries safer in our cities.
"If these amendments, supported by dozens of cities across Europe, can succeed, we can save literally hundreds of lives across the EU in years to come. I am deeply concerned at the position of the British government and urge them to embrace this vital issue."
A spokesman for the Department for Transport said in response: "We share the mayor's concerns about the potential benefits of improved cab design and we want to see changes in the industry.
"Where we are not supporting European Parliament proposals, it is simply because they will not produce practical changes in cab design and could lead to additional bureaucracy for Britain."
Later that year, a “trialogue” session involving members of the European Commission, European Parliament and European Council approved plans for regulations for safer lorries which are due to come into effect in 2019, overcoming opposition from France, home to truck maker Renault, and Sweden, where Scania and Volvo are based.
Ahead of that session, Johnson had joined British Cycling policy advisor Chris Boardman and Kate Cairns, founder of the safety campaign See Me Save Me, in urging the UK government to implement the changes without delay.
In 2015, the Freight Transport Association called on former Prime Minister David Cameron to ensure the UK government provided incentives for haulage firms to adopt safer lorries.
Despite the forthcoming EU rules which place the onus on truck manufacturers to comply with safety rules, some such as Mercedes have already taken matters into their own hands and are producing lorries with features such as 'direct vision' cabs, which are now being picked up by fleet operators in the UK.
Back in 2014, Cycling UK highlighted to Johnson that under existing rules, it would have been possible to introduce safer lorries to London.
Today, the charity's policy director, Roger Gefffen, told road.cc: "Cycling UK shared Boris's frustration four years ago when two EU member states blocked efforts to introduce EU-wide rules to require safe lorry cab designs that could save pedestrians' and cyclists' lives.
"However we then pointed out a way that safe lorry cabs could be required within the current rules for all but the longest lorries.
"With the current London mayor now acting on our proposals, we hope the UK government will do likewise.
"If the drivers of construction vehicles and refuse lorries could see what's around them as easily as bus drivers can, our streets would be a lot safer for everyone."
Add new comment
10 comments
Cemex are already using direct vision lorries. I saw one on the way to work at the end of last week. Here's an article talking about their aoption of the new design: https://www.agg-net.com/news/cemex-first-to-operate-new-econic-tipper
The timing of Boris' resignation is extremely interesting. I for one am convinced that he couldn't cope with the competition from Trump as the biggest blond buffoon in the UK.
Hmmm, you might be right. He may be planning something spectacular if the Baby Tump Ballon stunt gets more publicity than his Buffoon On A Zipwire... snatch back that title!
I doubt that this is much of a problem where lorries are not driving in towns and cities during the daytime. Perhaps we are looking at this problem the wrong way...
Quite. Apart from the occasional delivery of some massive piece of infrastructure, shouldn't lorries be delivering to hubs on the outskirts of cities? The majority of goods can then be delivered with cargo bikes.
[
[/quote]
Quite. Apart from the occasional delivery of some massive piece of infrastructure, shouldn't lorries be delivering to hubs on the outskirts of cities? The majority of goods can then be delivered with cargo bikes.
[/quote]
Yeah, right. OK maybe in a city like York, but just you try it in Sheffield!
I'm unsure how you expect a city centre supermarket to restock with cargobikes . . that said, into city centres, limits on the size of vehicle could be imposed during peak hours, or only with escort vehicles. (Basically reduce the size of vehicle classed as oversize during busy hours)
Any supermarket supply chain will already have "city trailers" for artics with steering rear axles, these should be compulsary in central areas to reduce overrunning pavements in corners. Given the number of trucks being replaced annually in fleets, making a pro-active move to safer trucks (as many logistics firms are already doing) allows for better advertising for them. Stick the newest city friendly, clean engined rigs to the busiest cities first, and work outwards. Older rigs can still work on more open routes where it's less of an issue - into out of town drops where they drop a whle trailer load at a time.
While a move to replace all the construction trucks will be met with oposition on costs from the industry, a change in culture is more important here. paying drivers "per load" into a city centre encourages excessinve speeds, red light running, dangerous passes, illegal use of restricted roads and "short cuts" through residential streets to get "one more load" and some more cash before the day's end. Better visibility won't help with drivers more focussed on getting there fast than safely.
Boris in 2014: UK government should push for the laws to be brought through, ahead of protests from France and Sweden
Boris now: Were leaving the EU, yet we are still stuck waiting for the EU for 4+ years
Who'd've thought it? A politician talking rubbish just to serve his own ends.
Quite. Is anyone even remotely surprised?
Without wanting this to go into a full on brexit debate, it is unfortunately representative of the misinformation surrounding the referendum (on both sides).
As far as Johnson is concerned though, I am amazed by any story including his comments on the subject that do not also highlight just how firmly he sat on the fence right up until he finally decided that supporting the brexit campaign was best
for himthe country.(NB - above comment isn't necessarily directed at the the above story. There is only so much evidence of someone being a self serving, lying git that can be included in one article without it looking like a hatchet job...)