Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
9 comments
It's possible McQ will accept the USADA report as they are up to their eyeballs with implications of complicity. Acceptance will at least give them time go over every possible bit of evidence against them, don't forget there's another tidal wave of shite coming shortly from an investigative body in Italy, it's reckoned to be of tsunami proportions.
Oddly enough, I think the chances of an appeal to CAS are quite high because Lance didn't go to arbitration.
I only have two days to read the whole lot, perhaps I should give up on sleep?
UCI have no jurisdiction in this case - they derogate the responsibility for drug testing through WADA to USADA. Failure to act on the findings would be a fundamental failure of their responsibilities - but let's not let due process get in the way of egos and ca$h-stuffed envelopes.
monty dog: I don't think that that is true. UCI are in direct control of anti-doping at many large events I think. E.g. the WADA report on when they acted as Independent Observer at a recent tour, available in the USADA Armstrong files, notes the anti-doping chaperones are UCI and usually former commissaires - who tend to have been racers themselves back in their day, and hence somewhat sympathetic to the current riders!
Let's wait and see shall we (and leave VerBruggens age out of it whist we're at it) - But anything less than an acknowledgement of partial responsibility for what went on and a serious and substantive review of UCI's future stance on doping response just will not wash and will further add to calls for Pat to move over.
Bad news I think. Certainly if Paddy was going to step down he wouldn't announce it in person at the press conference. So I think cycling is stuck with him.
I hope it's to announce they ratify USADA's decision, Verbruggen will walk and they will commence a root and branch review, ultimately with the aim of setting up an entirely independent anti-doping body for cycling. Verbruggen the sacrificial lamb but no real change I fear.
We are all waiting with bated breath here.Just to piss everyone off he may go to arbitration to simply drag out the inevitable. You would have to pull every legal loop hole out of the book to justify your position as governing authority and usurp USADA. Heads will have to roll and with that old fart Verbruggen, I can not see them doing a Dylan Thomas and going gently into that good night....the evidence is overwhelming nonetheless.
There is a scene from the film 'Serenity' that perfectly suits what should be said to Pat McQuaid:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379786/quotes?qt=qt0433117
I wonder, if all they had to announce was "We're accepting the USADA report" would that need a press conference with Pat McQuaid to answer questions from the press? That makes me wonder will they be announcing an appeal to CAS?