Plenty of Brits are considering tackling their fuel spending by taking more journeys by bike, with as many as 30 per cent excited to rediscover two-wheeled journeys, according to a study by online cycling retailer Chain Reaction.
The research published in the Independent newspaper saw 2,000 adults surveyed, finding that nearly four in 10 are planning to cut their fuel spend by cycling more of their journeys.
Nearly half (48 per cent) wanted to cycle more than they currently do, with 30 per cent excited to rediscover the joy of cycling, and 44 per cent after more exercise and 40 per cent seeking more fresh air.
Of the reasons why those who had not cycled for at least 12 months had avoided it, 18 per cent said they lacked the confidence, while five per cent did not think they had enough time to repair their old bicycle.
Old bicycles knocking around the garage was a common theme in the responses. About 40 per cent said they had an old bike that could be restored to road-worthy condition, while 23 per cent said they would prefer to restore their old bike rather than buying a new one.
In total, 36 per cent said their bike was not in a roadworthy state, but 89 per cent believed it only needed minor tweaks to make it safe.
Of the 2,000 surveyed, nearly two thirds (63 per cent) said they had sought alternative methods of travel other than their car in the last three months.
The study comes a month after figures published by the Department for Transport as part of its National Travel Survey showed that the average person in England made two per cent of their trips by bicycle between November 2020 and November 2021, while the average number of trips made by bike dropped to 15, down from a high of 20 the previous year.
The figures also showed that the percentage of people who cycle at least once a week for any purpose has fallen from 11.6 per cent to 9.1 per cent, with the average annual mileage covered by bike dropping by 33 miles to 55 miles (a figure more in keeping with pre-pandemic trends, but still much higher than the 39 miles per person recorded in 2002).
Cycling UK responded to the figures by arguing the fall to pre-pandemic levels in England was due to "short-sighted" councils removing protected bike lanes during the initial Covid lockdown.
Also last month, the chief executive of the Go-Ahead Group, one of the UK's largest public transport companies, urged the British government to banish cars from urban roads and instead aspire to the Netherlands' cycling-friendly cities, ultimately to encourage more cycling journeys.
What do you make of Chain Reaction's study? What would help get more people ditching their vehicles for two-wheeled journeys? Let us know in the comments...
Add new comment
11 comments
And yet they won't. It's as easy as getting on a bike, but they will continue to reach for the car keys. This is why policy will only succeed in encouraging zero emissions non-car transport by actively disinscentivising car travel over short distances. Making it slower than the alternatives and logistically unappealing is the only way. This is demonstrated by the Continental approach to infrastructure, not just for travel but for storage.
From the exponential increase in N Bristol traffic over the past 2 weeks it looks like everyone's happy to cough up for fuel. The irony is that there's a massive discussion over shaving money of home energy bills, but suggest someone ditches the car in favour of walking/cycling to save fuel and they look at you in complete bewilderment. I literally can't remember the last time I filled up with fuel; had to find an excuse to get the car out recently just to give it a run and stop the battery going flat.
What's needed is a network of "cycling buddies" - experienced cyclists who are willing to advise and encourage novices.
Sometimes, it just needs a helping hand, to clamber up the learning curve, before despondency creeps in, and the novice gives up
I think there are several in existence - not sure there's a national scheme though.
Best (and most fun) way to influence people's behaviour is like this, in relationships, one or two at a time. It's also labour intensive though!
In my town (Crawley) most commuters will be going to the airport or the industrial estate/business park, so it shouldn't be difficult to hook up with other cyclists.
There does seem to be a dearth of them though, as I only see 3 or 4, on my 4 mile journey - which is mostly cycle paths, and generally flat)
The 'I want to save fuel' element in this story is hilarious. The amount of drivers who think (word used advisedly) the way to drive in town should consist of 'floor it between each set of traffic lights' then sit for ages idling the engine while their partner goes into the shops, yet moan about how a cyclist once 'held them up for twenty minutes' is worse now than it was pre-pandemic.
People are stupid.
This is something that's really starting to piss me off, and I'm starting to notice it more and more. Drivers will just pull up next to a load of people and just leave their engine running for 20 mins whilst they wait for something/someone. Not only is it disrespectful, it's illegal under Sec. 42 of the 1988 Road Traffic Act.
Unfortunately some of those "tweaks to make it safe" can often cost more than the bike is worth.
An obsessive, like many of us, would of course find this completely acceptable, the rest of the normal population, not so much...
Maybe I'm the glass half empty pessimist,but my takeaway from that is that's 2/3rds of Brits, or 6 out of 10 of them who arent planning to cut fuel spend by cycling more and those planning to, are simply expressing good intentions,not actually enacting that change.
And it will be the more familiar list of excuses not reported there, for any one who has tried to champion cycling to a non believer if you like has heard before, the weathers always bad, too many hills in the way, takes too long, too hard etc etc
I've some empathy with the far too bloomin dangerous on the roads rationalising, having already reached double figures in close passes this week, multiple punishment passes and a delightful chap today who used his horn (not in the Ashley Neal manner) as they then drew alongside me, said something rude I couldnt really hear and tried to cut me up for good measure, just because I held prime through a pelican crossing that had just turned green for us where a pedestrian who had missed their light sequence was clearly still considering risking running across in front of me in the traffic gap instead of waiting for their next green light to cross.
But what can you do, just goto to keep on keeping on.
It's a case of "don't let 'em get you down. Thankless though because either change is too late for you or with luck eventually - you'll be irrelevant.
Agree on the "just because people say something - and maybe even really believe it when they say it - doesn't mean they end up doing it". Works both ways though, I've seen a few "I'd never do"'s converted.
Why is it that many of the people who say the roads are too dangerous to cycle on are often the most dangerous drivers on the road?