The Triban RC 500 SPD Road Cycling Shoes are surprisingly capable road-biased shoes. They're well suited to commuting, touring and general riding, though there are better options for training/harder riding.
- Pros: Surprisingly comfortable, easy to care for
- Cons: Not the stiffest sole; sizing
> Find your nearest Decathlon store here
Materials/construction
These are fully synthetic, with a 100% polyester inner sock and perforated polyurethane upper with an angular mesh panel across the toe box to assist climate control. "Bumpers" around the toes are designed to combat premature wear and accidental toe-stubbing.
The sole comprises a glass fibre mid, polyester outer and rubberised grippers. They're drilled for recessed twin-bolt cleats and offer a decent blend of pedalling efficiency and walkability/grip.
Subtle retro-reflective detailing is strategically positioned around the heel, sides and laces.
Build quality is uniformly good throughout, and is reinforced by a two-year warranty against manufacturing defects. I'm still running B'Twin shoes and other kit thousands of miles, and several years hence, with no hint of imminent retirement.
I prefer the neat convenience of Boa dials or buckle type systems, but the laces ensure easy tunability and even pressure across the foot – a bonus, given that the sizing is less precise than numbers would suggest. I default to a 44 in most brands' cycling shoes, but these, with their long, narrow design, I found uncomfortably tight.
I might have stuck with 44s had they been the RC 520s, which are leather so will mould to the feet over time, but the size 45 RC 500s that were sent in for testing were fine, given that I use a specialist insole and default to touring/trail socks, the sort with reinforced toe and heel sections.
Power transfer/efficiency
Overall performance has been favourable. On the road, power transfer doesn't match that of sportier types, but it's superior to trainer-type commuter/touring shoes. Powering up 1-in-7s on my fixed there was some discernible give, but rigidity is a pronounced improvement on trainer types. I've cruised along the flat for several hours at 18-20mph without any sense of foot fatigue or those painful "hot spots" that can make a challenging ride miserable. Ten miles of stop/start town riding seems the ticket.
I've also indulged in mixed terrain day rides, and again the soles have struck just the right balance between power transfer and practicality off the bike. However, sole flex was more apparent with the off-road pedals' smaller surface area.
While I wouldn't be reaching for emery paper, the rubberised tread needs to coarsen slightly before you can reliably walk over slippery surfaces, such as mossy tiles or wet stones.
Comfort/climate control
The 500s provide good support, especially around the heel cup and toe sections. Breathability is one of the downsides of synthetic uppers but, thus far (paired with merino/hybrid blend socks), moisture and odour management is better than I'd expect, especially at this price point.
I was a bit sceptical as to how effective the big mesh panel would be. A race slipper with multiple vents would certainly be airier, but with temperatures ranging between 19 and 25°C, they've been up to the job. My feet have never exceeded the faintly clammy stage, and thus far there have been no funky odours.
Unexpected showery rain hasn't resulted in soggy feet either, although beyond two or three-mile scoots I'd be packing overshoes if rain was forecast. (Compatibility seems fine with standard road-biased models, such as Alé's Winter Shoe Covers.)
Durability
These are very easy to care for: a damp cloth should be all you need to dismiss everyday dirt and grime, while more stubborn stuff is easily removed with a product such as Crankalicious Epic Hide Leather and Vinyl Leather Cleaner or a conventional leather cleaner.
After 500 mixed terrain miles, wear is limited to superficial erosion of the toe and heel tread.
Value
These are certainly good value, although if you're seeking something slightly sportier you might do better to stretch the budget slightly: the B'Twin 500 road shoes are £49.99, feature a three-strap Velcro closure system and offer a choice of recessed twin-bolt SPD or three-bolt cleats, while for another £25 you could get the leather RC 520s I mentioned earlier, which promise a stiffer sole.
> Buyer's Guide: 11 of the best cheap cycling shoes
Conclusion
Ultimately, there are better options for more spirited riding, but despite some quirks I've enjoyed testing the RC 500s and feel they meet the cross-purpose design brief competently. And if you don't like the Whale Grey/Navy Blue of our test pair, alternatives are Grey, Bordeaux/charcoal grey, Black/Black and Fluro Orange/ Charcoal Grey.
Verdict
Well-priced and competent choice for commuting and touring, but check the sizing
Make and model: Triban RC 500 SPD Road Cycling Shoes
Tell us what the product is for
Triban says, "Developed by our design team, these Triban SPD road-cycling shoes combine pedalling efficiency with comfort. The even lacing system enables a close fit and also provides you with a uniform distribution of pressure. When not pedalling, the polyurethane rubber soles enable you to walk comfortably and safely."
They're surprisingly capable shoes for commuting/touring and general riding, though their 520 siblings are probably a better bet for training and more spirited riding.
Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?
From Decathlon:
100.00% Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
UPPER OF
100.00% Polyurethane (PU)
LINING AND SOCK OF
100.00% Polyester (PES)
CARE INSTRUCTIONS:
FITTING COMFORT
Lace-up shoes for even pressure distribution
RIGIDITY
Nylon sole filled with fibreglass for efficient pedalling
FIT
Heel and toe stiffeners and even lacing system with 5 eyelets
LIGHTWEIGHT
306g in size 8,
613g per pair in 8
VENTILATION
Perforated upper with mesh over the forefoot
ABRASION RESISTANCE
Stiffener on the toe so you don't bash your toes when stopping or walking
USER COMFORT
PU rubber sole for walking comfortably
Rate the product for quality of construction:
7/10
Well made. Two-year warranty boosts confidence.
Rate the product for performance:
6/10
Strike a good balance between efficiency and walking comfort, better suited to commuting and touring than training/sportives.
Rate the product for durability:
7/10
Seem pretty durable thus far. I've taken ours on and off road, without any signs of wear in 400 miles.
Rate the product for fit:
7/10
Decent fit but favour long, relatively slender feet.
Rate the product for sizing:
5/10
Sizing is a little off piste. I'm typically a 44 in cycling shoes but took a gamble on the 45 which paid off (with thicker merino-rich socks).
Rate the product for weight:
5/10
Rate the product for comfort:
6/10
Surprisingly good, in every respect, especially given the synthetic uppers and relatively high, summer temperatures.
Rate the product for value:
7/10
How easy is the product to care for? How did it respond to being washed?
Very straightforward: simply wipe over with a clean, damp rag. More ingrained dirt was removed easily using a gentle cleanser.
Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose
Overall, the Triban RC500s have struck a decent balance between walking comfort/practicality and pedalling efficiency. Despite my initial scepticism, the faux leather uppers have proven relatively temperate and surprisingly water resistant. Seemingly rugged, they've coped well in road and trail contexts. Personally, I'd spend an extra £25 and go for their 520 siblings, which promise stiffer soles and have full leather uppers.
Tell us what you particularly liked about the product
Met the design brief well. Responsive sole that's easy to walk in. They're easy to care for, so should hold up well in the longer term.
Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product
The sizing.
How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on road.cc?
A very good price, cheaper than most. Riders wanting something slightly sportier could plump for the BTwin 500 road shoes, at £49.99, which feature a three-strap Velcro closure system and a choice of recessed twin-bolt SPD, or three-bolt cleats.
Did you enjoy using the product? Yes
Would you consider buying the product? On balance, I'd go for the 520.
Would you recommend the product to a friend? Possibly, depending on their budget, but I'd probably steer them towards the 520 if funds permitted.
Use this box to explain your overall score
They're competent shoes for commuting and touring, at a very good price.
Age: 45 Height: 1m 81cm Weight: 70kg
I usually ride: Rough Stuff Tourer Based around 4130 Univega mtb Frameset My best bike is: 1955 Holdsworth Road Path and several others including cross & traditional road
I've been riding for: Over 20 years I ride: Most days I would class myself as: Experienced
I regularly do the following types of riding: cyclo-cross, commuting, touring, fixed/singlespeed, mountain biking
Add new comment
3 comments
Is the rc520 really supposed to have stiffer soles ?
I'm thinking in buying of the 2 but can't really decide on leather vs synthetic.
I bought these when riding le tour de course
Corsica. Very comfortable and walking is good.
More like a normal shoe when out and about.
As I bought a pair of these just yesterday the article came as a big surprise. I have been out today wearing them kitted out for Speedplay Frog pedals. I found the stiffness of the sole really good, better than my old ones, the sole was the reason I bought them and they didn't disappoint on my fixed gear ride, the short one in six hill on my circuit was a good test.