- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Cross country mountain bikes
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
13 comments
From DC rainmaker - http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2010/05/understanding-sport-device-gps.html
Was out this weekend doing hill repeats and as soon as it started to rain, the elevation stopped going up on my Garmin 800 (over the same hill loop). End result was a 2000 foot difference. Pretty poor really and one of the reasons why I use it less and less
It works on air pressure, it needs to know the altitude to associate with the pressure as is. GPS can give height but it is never very accurate.
GPS can give accurate height if you are using an assortment of satellites more or less above you. However, for cycling (and indeed driving) people are generally much more concerned with position (and speed), which is much more accurately measured by satellites closer to the horizon, so our GPS units are programmed to look for and use satellites in those positions.
I have found that if you add a couple of elevation points into the unit, it gennerally gives a more accurate figure, I set my home and top of a local hill.
Now have 5 different people with Garmins who did exact same route on Sunday and all 5 climbing elevations are different. Ranging from 2900 ft to 4700ft. So it's not even a close range. Really annoying when you think of the money these things cost.
My barometer (Edge 705) froze one evening, climbed a mountain in a blizzard, Garmin recorded 7' of climbing.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36d87/36d8744f3c7aa11c3d69bd02deaa5cd2215b9bce" alt="39"
This was corrected on upload though.
Thanks Ianrobo, it's on the activities page for those looking for the setting.
my 510 can be pretty screwy with elevation too. Sometimes the uncorrected data will show me going up or down a cliff several hundred metres high. most odd when I've been riding in the fens.
on Garmin connect. I find the elevation correction strange. The last time I used it, it halved the height but when I planned the same route it was within 10% of the route on the garmin.
Is that a setting on the device, garmin connect or stava?
Auto correct on upload will get it closer.
It works on air pressure most of the time and so you'll get deviations as a result of changes in the wind (was one of you wheel sucking more than the other?). I think it also uses a correlate off the satellites, but they can be pretty unreliable especially up a mountain.
I think that there is an auto-correct when you upload it to Garmin connect, or at least there used to be.
Also, if you have a route planned which has the altitude plotted that will help correct some of the altitude issues too - the computer uses an algorithm to calculate the altitude based on the air pressure and other factors, which if you are working on a mountain and you have high wind it can cause massive fluctuations.