At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I believe he's already started on your second sentence with his determination to force New York to tear out its cycle lanes. As for the first, he...
Surely Pog has souplesse in spades?
Whatever works for you but I find quite the opposite works best, because of the extra stiff reinforcement around the valve that's the hardest bit...
This way if the hooks fail the bikes just fall a few inches sideways, no harm done...
Correct. But it was a brilliant opportunity to showcase his picture.
Not always, remember the 2023 Giro when Geraint arguably lost the race with his long momentum-killing bike change in the final TT, the long stop...
I'm pretty sure they were reviewing previous complaints the little onion had submitted to the police, not social media. But your point stands.
It offers some left-hook prevention (good) and they have put some physical dividers in at the entrances / exits (also good) - but not everywhere. ...
Brexit is also why a lot of EU police forces issue on the spot fines.
Like so?