- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
2693 comments
Of course what's really happening is that they could provide more parking but they don't so they can get the fines income. It's the same with the speeding fines, and seat belts: if they were compulsory, they'd be fitted to every - oh.
It's them bleeding' forrin drivers innit, don't understand a word that's said to - oh
Both stationary and fast enough to be termed "runaway" and to smash a window?
I can think of a few songs that refer to cars or driving e.g. Roy Orbison, Sad Cafe, Gary Numan, Madness, but no poetry...
Expect a sternly worded letter from my lawyers
Could be worse - at least there won't be a squirrel's head in your bed tonight !
I wish one of the whizz kids at Road CC would sort out this thread so things like this didn't happen. But they don't check the Forums🙈
Bit harsh. Your post had NO hi viz, how was he supposed to see it?
Data protection. The same reason faces are sometimes obscured on others posted in the thread and the police even blanked out their own regs in one bot edited tweet on the daily blog . I expect as GDPR rulings on these are still up in the air, companies and organisations don't want a GDPR ruling applied to them and potential fines so hide them.
I think the key line was “I heard lots of shouting and thought there might have been some sort of event taking place – I had expected to perhaps see some people coming down the street on bikes,”
Do lots of bikes come down the street when the market is being setup?
Touché!
Bit of a tenuous link from a reg plate to a specific person to say it is personal data.
But I can enter that reg plate into certain websites and get some data, can enter that data elsewhere and get more. Or maybe do an image search and trace you on facebook. Or be malcious and go a red mondeo, I have one and I need to clone the number plate for nefarious purposes so thanks BBC, the one you just published will do fine. As I mentioned it is mostly a "lets not be risked being sued" response.
Plenty of red Mondeos here, reg plates visible even in the thumbnail view - easier than looking on local newspaper reports, surely?
And most of those are done by the owners of the vehicles. I'm not stating that is the sole reason or that it is a consistent process across the board. Just that people are more inclined now to mitigate against what could be concieved as a privacy breach so they decide to hide faces and reg plates and other identifiers when posting them publically.
Data protection. The same reason faces are sometimes obscured on others posted in the thread
This appears to be 'urban myth' type bollocks to me. I don't believe (admittedly, all I know about the law is the dodges applied by Lancashire Constabulary to thwart it- couldn't resist that) that anyone could get into any trouble of any sort for taking, publishing, 'sharing', tweeting etc. photos of vehicles including the registration in any circumstances we're concerned with in this topic. I guess that there could be trouble if the vehicle was undercover police, secret service etc, or if there was a court order not to publish it. Pretty much all the vehicles in this topic are 'totalled'.
that's what I thought but the ICO disagrees !
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-t...
I don't follow their example
"A vehicle’s registration number can be linked to other information held about the registration (eg by the DVLA) to indirectly identify the owner of that vehicle."
The dvla already know who the keeper is but you can't ask them who it is, so I find it all unconvincing that a photo has to be redacted.
that's what I thought but the ICO disagrees !
The Information Commissioner is like the police- inept and forever trying it on. This was the Commissioner trying to prevent 9 names being revealed at a dodgy health trust (later the subject of several proper inquiries):
“ They do not have a public or political profile or personal responsibility
at a macro level for budgetary, personnel or policy matters; their chief
executives are ultimately accountable for their work; and they therefore
have a reasonable expectation that their privacy should be respected and
their names protected.”
The Information Tribunal completely disagreed and forced the disclosure of all 9 names. Recently the Commissioner tried to get away with supporting NHS England in declaring me as 'vexatious' so that they wouldn't have to bother with the information request. That was in the Commissioner's Decision Notice, but as soon as I fired the 21 gun broadside at the Commissioner at the Information Tribunal, she withdrew her Decision Notice and allegations immediately. I would have no hesitation in going against the Commissioner declaring that the registration number of a vehicle smashing through the wall of a building must be kept secret. She's a duffer imported from Canada to support the government's wishes for secrecy,
Off topic much?
So you've got the satisfaction of getting 9 clinicians'/ middle managers' names - did that help your cause any? Agree: the bloom is off the boom with the IC.
You have to work pretty hard to earn the "Vexatious" badge: have you? It is different to "annoying", and "persistent", and "on to something".
oh yes you can!
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/v888-request-by-an-individual...
you need a good reason for doing so, but anyone can ask for details of a car's owner based on the licence plate.
I suspect nothing would come from it. However you will notice that it is mostly organisations / companies who do it to be on the safe side just in case. They could be fined alot of found to breach anything or sued for some reason so they want to err on the side of caution.
That's data protection gone mad, that is. Thing is, it's not done consistently by newspapers.
Police social media is more consistent. All law enforcement should be on the record - that protects everyone.
Not so sure. A car crashed outside my house, and their number plate was obscured, but mine, in the background, not. I phoned the Echo to complain, and they said as I wasn't involved, I didn't have the right to have my number plate hidden
And another one:
Soundwell Road crash: Car flips onto roof in 'serious' collision - updates
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/soundwell-road-crash-car...
Those yellow, reflective taped bollards failed to make themselves visible.
https://goo.gl/maps/Mk9GuhYCxvSerfVv9
Maybe they should take the advice from over the border and avoid driving at night?
Well I blame the home owner. He decided to strip the house of it's hi-viz and then gets hit in the dark.
I'd put in some tank traps, purely as a heritage exhibit of coastal defences of course, having a rusting steel I beam to crash into might focus some minds
There was a similar event on a beach in SE Anglesey about 25 years ago- the car was terminated, by the tide I think. Better still...it was a BMW.
Joy of joys! Google finds loads of these... OK, so it's a bit off-topic, but stiil fun!
https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/moment-60k-car-submerged-sea-16230881
https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/cemaes-bay-tide-submerges-car-11435010
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-56250162
Pages